Run a 60‑Minute Process Discovery Workshop

Overview
- TL;DR: In one hour, align on scope, roles, and the happy path; capture 1–2 key exceptions; and exit with a lightweight BPMN draft plus owners and next steps. Keep the session tightly time‑boxed and focused on outcomes over tooling.
- Why this matters: Process mapping clarifies how work actually flows so teams can improve it and reduce delays and errors (Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Flowchart guide, https://www.ihi.org/library/tools/flowchart). Short, well‑structured workshops reduce cognitive load and decision fatigue (Nielsen Norman Group on chunking and working memory, https://www.nngroup.com/articles/chunking/).
- What you’ll get: an agenda, scripts, and a starter template that consistently produces a review‑ready diagram and concrete follow‑ups.
Agenda (60 Minutes)
0–5 min — Welcome, scope, and outcomes
- Script: “In 60 minutes we will agree on the scope, map the main flow, capture 1–2 common exceptions, and assign owners for next steps.”
- Frame the scope with a one‑sentence process statement: “From [trigger] to [end state] for [audience/channel].” Timeboxing improves focus and throughput (Scrum Guide on time‑boxing principles, https://scrumguides.org/).
5–15 min — Map participants and hand‑offs
- Identify roles/teams/systems; these become BPMN lanes/pools (Camunda BPMN 2.0 reference on Participants, https://docs.camunda.org/manual/latest/reference/bpmn20/).
- Capture known hand‑offs; prefer role names (e.g., “Customer Support”) over individuals for reuse.
15–40 min — Capture the happy path
- Narrate the primary scenario from trigger to outcome. Keep it to 7–10 key activities on the first pass to avoid over‑detailing (Nielsen Norman Group on chunking, https://www.nngroup.com/articles/chunking/).
- Place steps into lanes as you go to make responsibilities explicit. Use plain‑language, verb‑first labels (Digital.gov Plain Language, https://digital.gov/guides/plain-language).
40–50 min — Add the essential exceptions
- Add 1–2 common branches (e.g., “Missing info,” “Out of policy”) using exclusive gateways. If more emerge, log them for a follow‑up session to keep this workshop productive.
- If external parties are involved (customer, vendor), model them as separate pools to clarify boundaries (Camunda reference, Participants).
50–60 min — Review, decisions, and next steps
- Read the flow aloud end‑to‑end; confirm each decision has labeled branches and destinations.
- Decide owners for open questions and data needs; capture due dates. Summarize decisions and share immediately. Clear roles/ownership reduce rework (Atlassian Team Playbook on Roles & Responsibilities/RACI, https://www.atlassian.com/team-playbook/plays/roles-and-responsibilities).
Starter Template (Copy/Paste)
- Process name: [e.g., “Customer Refund — Online Orders”]
- Scope: From [trigger] to [end state] for [audience/channel]
- Lanes (roles/teams): [Role A], [Role B], [System]
- Main path: Start → [1] … → [2] … → [3] … → End
- Decision: [condition?] → Yes: … / No: …
- Outputs: [artifacts, notifications, updates]
- Open questions: [who owns], [due date]
Facilitation Tips (That Keep It Moving)
- Time‑box visibly: keep a timer on screen and announce halfway points; time‑boxing helps maintain momentum (Scrum Guide, https://scrumguides.org/).
- Diagram last, discuss first: capture steps in bullets before arranging shapes; this prevents tool friction from derailing content (IHI Flowchart guidance, https://www.ihi.org/library/tools/flowchart).
- Enforce plain language: prefer “Verify customer identity” over “Handle verification.” It improves comprehension and speeds consensus (Digital.gov Plain Language, https://digital.gov/guides/plain-language).
- Limit concurrency: one editor, one narrator. Rotate if needed to keep engagement high (Nielsen Norman Group on workshop facilitation, https://www.nngroup.com/articles/workshop-facilitation/).
- Park edge cases: note them in a “parking lot” doc; deep dives become follow‑ups, not derailers.
Common Pitfalls (And How to Avoid Them)
- Scope creep: unrelated subprocesses appear mid‑discussion. Fix: restate the scope sentence; log spin‑off processes for later.
- Role ambiguity: steps bounce between lanes. Fix: rename lanes by role/team; confirm ownership as you place activities (Camunda Participants, https://docs.camunda.org/manual/latest/reference/bpmn20/).
- Vague labels: “Handle request.” Fix: use verb + object (“Validate request data”) and keep labels concise (Digital.gov Plain Language).
- Tool‑first mapping: teams start dragging shapes immediately. Fix: capture in bullets first; layout after content.
Outputs You Should Leave With
- A legible BPMN draft showing the happy path plus 1–2 common exceptions.
- A list of open questions with owners and due dates (RACI style responsibilities assist clarity; Atlassian Team Playbook, https://www.atlassian.com/team-playbook/plays/roles-and-responsibilities).
- A brief summary email or page with decisions, the diagram link, and the next workshop (if needed).
Follow‑Up (Next 48 Hours)
- Share the diagram and notes; request asynchronous comments with a 72‑hour deadline.
- Apply minor edits for clarity (spacing, labels, lanes) and tag owners for final confirmation.
- Schedule a 30‑minute exceptions session only if needed.
References
- Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI): Flowchart (https://www.ihi.org/library/tools/flowchart)
- Scrum Guide: Time‑boxing (https://scrumguides.org/)
- Camunda: BPMN 2.0 Reference — Participants (Pools/Lanes) (https://docs.camunda.org/manual/latest/reference/bpmn20/)
- Digital.gov: Plain Language (https://digital.gov/guides/plain-language)
- Nielsen Norman Group: Chunking Content for Comprehension (https://www.nngroup.com/articles/chunking/)
- Nielsen Norman Group: Workshop Facilitation (https://www.nngroup.com/articles/workshop-facilitation/)
- Atlassian Team Playbook: Roles & Responsibilities (RACI) (https://www.atlassian.com/team-playbook/plays/roles-and-responsibilities)
About BPMN AI Team
The BPMN AI team consists of business process experts, AI specialists, and industry analysts.
Related posts

Boardroom‑Ready BPMN Diagrams Without Manual Cleanup
Make responsibilities obvious, reduce review friction, and present with confidence.

Compliance Built‑In: Pass BPMN Reviews the First Time
Bake BPMN 2.0 rules, modeling guidelines, and readability checks into your workflow to eliminate review rework.

From Notes to BPMN in Minutes
Turn meeting notes into clear, review‑ready process diagrams — without getting lost in tooling.